Adrienne bailon photos page, hot aishwarya rai, adam lambert boyfriend,

Spatcher · Guest

By arresting those guys? Who's side are you on?
The per capita argument is a strawman. Yes, we 300 million Americans produce more pollution per capita than the 1.2 billion Chinese. We also produce more pollution per capita than the Indian population. When you look at the big picture, however, you realize that China DOES produce more pollution than the US. The pollution that China is producing is on the rise, while the US is declining in pollution and has been for decades. It is ALSO true that the US is producing more CO2 now, but that is not pollution. It IS a greenhouse gas, but not pollution. The fact of the matter is that the U.N. wants the U.S. to pay money to other countries AND to reduce our use of energy. If we work less, produce less, etc. we will have less money to work on environmental progress, since the clean answers are a lot more expensive than the old, dirty way of working. If it were JUST a commitment to reduce our greenhouse gases and particulate pollution, I'd be all for it. It isn't. It's about the U.S. having hard to reach targets with financial penalties, while paying others, who have no commitments at all, money to compensate them for our having "polluted" the world with out presence.

Souppaya · Guest

“People have been practicing deforestation for thousands of years. I know this is hard for your reactionary mind to comprehend, but new forests grow and are planted in areas where they did not exist before. Global forest cover is stable. If my little bubble you mean the one where I actually go out and read about things instead of just making assumptions based on the fact that I think everything is terrible and is always going to get worse, then yeah I'm in my bubble.Yes, there is a point at which you will hit a limit as to how much development can be sustained without clearing too much, but that is a long, long, long way off. In the meantime maybe you should read up on sustainable forest management. Or you can live your life as if humans are the destroyer of your Mother Nature and the world is coming to an end.

Leisk · Guest

Any explanation as to why these are "intriguing"? Just a very short description and quip about the movie..nothing else..
you should try that.!

Jenny · Guest

You know, there is a technology category that you could look at and see nothing but technology stories. They hide it very effectively as the first category on the menu at the top of the page, right underneath the digg logo.Or you could just flip out.?
Wheres UK? Supposedly half of the British Adults are overweight.

Kklee · Guest

59 years old and having sex so intense it makes you forget the last few years?Daaaaaaamn.

Crezell · Guest

41 seconds in...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R-FZsysQNw

Shaderia · Guest

Not trying to ruin the fun here but I think people take this privacy thing farther than it needs to go. Last I checked Google has 91 million searches per day. If we are just talking about search data then ask yourself if you have to be concerned.Example: I have a bad case of eczema on the back of my legs. I'm embarrassed of this and try to pass it off as a burn. Here on the Internet I have little reason to be concerned, the only name you have to associate with this info is my user name. You don't know my real identity and I don't think you're going to go to the trouble of figuring out who I am.In the same way you shouldn't be concerned about your info being on the web. If Google is going to target their ads, their just going to get a wide survey of search patterns, they're not going to go and waste their time with associating your data with your actual identity.

NEINAST · Guest

!

aj michalka boyfriend