Adam lambert debut album news, adriana lima sex scene, you tube adam lambert,

Leanna · Guest

I hope I wasn't the only person who found all these countries very obvious, I'd like to see the other end of the spectrum, i.e. Japan, Singapore the UK.
So let me see, an article bitching about an ad on youtube, but the "ad" is actually a special page that isn't even a normal video. Yet here on Digg we get giant ass dragon ads with giant ass faces that render the comment area in a tiny fraction of the normal space?!wtf.

Noxolo Ngoma · Guest

“Well, maybe we do need to destroy economic development. After all, economic development as it exists today, exists for the sole purpose of keeping cyclical consumption going, without regard to efficiency and renewability, and for creating false scarcity of resources for the sole purpose of corporate profit interests. So yea, the economy can pretty much go to hell. We already have the technology to create efficient and renewable abundance, without profit interest, so why not use it? And if it takes a government to see that happen, well, ***** it, our grandchildren will thank us (you're not naive enough to think that the free market will welcome all this abundance and efficiency, which are enemies of profit, are you?)

Deary · Guest

A vaudevillian sex tape...???..
Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins!

Tavlin · Guest

Wow I've been on this road trip, almost exactly..?
Lol the Onion.. Wait, what for real?

Ethel · Guest

That's what happens when you let 14 year old boys imagination run wild with the html editor and code embedding software. Dont even get me started on the 14 year old girls.

Daniel · Guest

When did this trending thing start? I think it's kinda a bad idea. Not because it's annoying (Which it vaguely is, but to get seriously annoyed by something inconsequential like that is just silly) but because it won't give an accurate portrayal of whether or not people like an article.Look at it this way: Right now, there's a lot of blind diggers out there. People who digg based just on the headline/description. This is a serious problem, since it can cause horribly written articles to hit FP simply because the premise is good, and it also shifts the focus from the article to the submitter, which very well could be one of the causes of the poweruser phenomenon. Blind digging was a big enough problem before this change.Now, this trend thing comes along, and places a time limit on people. This makes it so people are even less likely to read through the article than before, because they're afraid the time limit will run out. Of course, we all know there's no penalty for not voting on a digg trend article, but there's a psychological effect when we know there's a time limit. People see the time limit, and out of fear of it, they compulsively hit the 'digg' button.Then there's the people who hate the digg trends so much, they rebel by burying any and all digg trend items. It's a ridiculous way to react, yes, but that's just how people are.I suggest letting people opt out of it, like sewalsh said, and making the time limit less prominent/imposing. It's a good basic idea (one of digg's biggest faults is that it takes a lot of time to hit front page) but it needs some tweaking.EDIT: See, people are already rebelling by burying. Told ya so.

Tamia · Guest

You ruined it with the /s

Toft · Guest

!

adam lambert on with the show release date